A SECRET WEAPON FOR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN EXECUTIVE AND NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS CASE LAWS

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws

Blog Article

Online access to case information for payments in decide on juvenile and domestic relations district courts. Cases may very well be searched using name, case number, or hearing date.

The mentioned case laws offer insights into how the courts interpret and implement Section 302, emphasizing the importance of the fair and just legal system. It is crucial for society to understand the gravity of this offense and also the need for stringent punishment to deter potential offenders and be certain justice for the victims and their people.

A survey of PACER users, conducted in 2021, measured consumer satisfaction and discovered areas for improvement with PACER services. The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts is using the survey results To judge and prioritize long term changes to PACER services and attributes.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

R.O, Office, Gujranwala along with the police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade in the accused hasn't been conducted yet. In the instant case, now the accused attempted to take advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the image in the petitioner was commonly circulated. The police should not have uncovered the identity with the accused through electronic media. The regulation lends assurance to the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly to the witness to detect the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and developed pictures. Other than, the images shown about the media expose that a mask was not placed over the accused to cover his identity until he was place up for an identification parade. Making pictures on the accused publically, possibly by showing the same into the witness or by publicizing the same in almost any newspaper or application, would create doubt during the proceedings in the identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to be certain that there isn't any chance for the witness to begin to see the accused before going for the identification parade. The accused should not be shown into the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or the press or electronic media. Supplied the reasons elaborated above, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 with the Constitution based over the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued towards the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement from the FIR lodged by FIA and in the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

 Petitioner obtaining been declared an absconder in this case for over a single along with a 50 percent year generates the apprehension that the petitioner could avoid standing trial and therefore delay the prosecution from the case. The material on record makes the case in the petitioner falls under two exceptions for the rule of grant of bail as mentioned over.

In almost any society, the enforcement of law and order is essential to maintain peace and protect its citizens. On the list of most critical crimes that can disrupt this harmony is murder. In Pakistan, Section 302 in the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC) deals with the punishment for murder, and its enforcement is crucial to guarantee justice prevails.

The prosecution presented substantial evidence, which include eyewitness testimonies and expert forensic analysis, confirming the copyright nature on the seized currency.

In simple terms, the section states that any person who commits intentional murder shall be subjected into the death penalty or life imprisonment, along with a potential fine.

The scrupulous reader may have noticed a little something higher than: a flaw. Past the first 7 words, the definition focuses around the intention to cause “Injury,” not the intention to cause death. The 2 essential elements that must be proven in order to convict a person of the crime are “

three. Rule of Regulation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of regulation and guaranteeing that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.

If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not experienced a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this will likely be only done If your website employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Within the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and also the petitioner company responded into the allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be seemed into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them to be fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)

Report this page